Decide at upload, not in the appeals queue.
Trust and safety teams are being asked to adjudicate AI likeness disputes with no authoritative record of who holds what rights. Proveniro gives platforms a machine-checkable answer at the moment of upload — and an AI provenance trail that makes the appeal short.
- check
- at upload
- answer
- grant status
- latency
- one API call
- standard
- C2PA aligned
Three failures that all trace back to a missing record.
Platforms are not short of AI detection signals. They are short of a source of truth about permission.
Unresolvable rights claims
Two parties assert conflicting rights over the same AI-generated likeness and neither can produce anything a moderator can verify in under an hour.
Over- and under-removal
Without a permission signal, the choice is between removing licensed content and leaving unlicensed content up. Both generate escalations.
Regulatory pressure
The EU AI Act and comparable rules increasingly expect AI labelling, provenance and a workable complaints path — as an operating requirement, not a roadmap item.
A permission check, a provenance signal, and a dispute path that terminates.
Designed to sit behind an existing moderation stack rather than replace any part of it.
Grant verification API
Ask whether a proposed AI use of a registered likeness is covered by a live grant. One call, one answer.
Content credentials
Read and write C2PA manifests, binding grant references and AI disclosure to produced assets at publication.
AI synthesis scoring
Detect generated or manipulated media at upload with a multimodal model ensemble, returning confidence and reason codes for review.
Dispute resolution
Resolve claims against a registry record with an audit trail, instead of competing screenshots.
Moderator tooling
Reviewer-facing context: what the models detected, which grant applies, what the holder permitted.
Privacy by design
Verification answers permission questions without exposing holder identity or contract terms.
Four hooks, all optional, all independently useful.
- 01
At upload
Score for synthesis and check any detected registered likeness against live grants.
inline
- 02
At publish
Attach or preserve content credentials so downstream consumers can verify AI origin.
manifest
- 03
At report
Resolve a likeness complaint against the registry rather than a manual investigation.
queue
- 04
At appeal
Show the record: what was detected, which grant was checked, what it said.
audit
Built to sit inside a pipeline that already exists.
No platform replaces its trust and safety stack for a new signal. This is an addition with a narrow, well-defined contract.
A rights check that leaks who licensed what to whom would never be adopted, and should not be. The verification API answers exactly one question — is this specific use permitted right now — and discloses nothing else about the holder or the deal behind it.
- verification API
- Single call returning granted, denied, expired or revoked with a reason and grant reference
- throughput
- Designed for upload-path volumes with regional endpoints and aggressive caching of negative results
- content credentials
- C2PA manifest read and write, issuer assertions, grant reference binding
- detection
- Generative AI synthesis scoring for audio, image and video with per-model reason codes
- privacy
- Permission answers only; no holder identity or commercial terms exposed to the platform
- audit
- Every verification logged to the provenance ledger and exportable for AI Act and regulatory response
Give moderators an answer instead of a judgement call.
We are working with platforms and marketplaces on the verification contract and the C2PA binding. Early integrators help define both.
soc 2 type ii in progress · eu & uk data residency · no ai training on your data